I’ve read some of the articles about the US Supreme Court case regarding the special election in Mobile with some interest. If you’re not aware, Sam Jones left his Mobile County commission seat in 2005 when he was elected mayor of Mobile. Governor Riley then appointed Juan Chastang, a black Republican, to the commission seat.
People said there should have been a special election. Locals got upset and the US Department of Justice got involved. Thanks to the Voting Rights Act, they run elections in Alabama. The USDOJ challenged the appointment and a three-judge federal panel ordered a special election. Chastang lost that election… bad. Merceria Ludgood, a Democrat, received around 80% of the vote.
So Riley is asserting that the election wasn’t proper, and the Supremes heard about it today. This is even more interesting because Riley just recently did it again. When Larry Langford became mayor of Birmingham, Riley appointed George Bowman to Langford’s Jefferson County commission seat. This is… yeah… exactly what a judicial panel faulted him for in 2005 except for a few changes in proper nouns.
I don’t know what is legally correct here. Maybe Riley has the authority to appoint vacant commission seats — I really just don’t know. Executive appointments in times of vacancy certainly aren’t unheard of. Special elections cost money and all. But the most amazing thing I’ve heard was this:
Riley … declined to say whether he would try to reinstate Chastang [as a Mobile County commissioner] over the will of the county’s voters if he were to win the case.
“We’ll make that decision at the time,” he said. “I’m not going to rule out anything.”
That he would even consider installing “20% Chastang” over “80% and actually elected Ludgood” blows my mind.